Labour’s election hammering isn’t a cue to drift right – it’s a reminder of what the left is for

To win trust, the left must focus on radical economic solutions, not culture wars

Keir Starmer

The results are starting to come in, and they tell the story we all expected: Reform UK has strong support across the country, while Labour - the incumbent government - has taken a hit.

For the prime minister, this must be more than just a moment of discomfort. It’s time take stock of what has been revealed, objectively, for the first time: the country is definitively rejecting Labour’s cautious managerialism, vague promises, and cultural triangulation. It’s time for a change in approach.

Across the West, the left is encountering somewhat of an identity crisis, pondering the question: what are we for? As support for the right surges, progressives have been forced to reckon with why their message isn’t resonating in an era of rampant inequality and widespread discontent. Perhaps, in recent years, the left has focused too much on identity and not enough on material change. Others suggest we have failed to take the public along with us. Either way, we are not winning the argument.

Here in the UK, that identity crisis is as clear as day. We’re supposed to have a centre-left government, but it’s hard to see much of the left in its actions. Yes, Labour has made some positive moves: strengthening workers’ rights, bolstering renters’ protections, and nationalising the railways. But these policies have been subject to watering down and given little more than a tepid push compared to Labour’s focus on reducing immigration, streamlining the state, and cutting welfare benefits.

There are voices within the party – close to the leadership – who think that Labour must move further right, particularly on immigration and identity. They argue that Labour must “understand” Reform voters, which always seems to mean appeasing the worst of their rhetoric. But for those of us who believe this path is both morally bankrupt and strategically flawed, the message from the locals should bolster our cause: Labour cannot outflank Reform on reactionary politics and nor should it try.

Let’s be clear: Reform UK isn’t gaining ground because its economic or social offer is coherent. There’s plenty to critique in Nigel Farage’s platform, much of which has already been exposed, but must be continually hammered at by commentators and politicians alike. People are voting for this firebrand challenger because their lives have worsened over the past 14 years and Labour has offered little by way of bold, hopeful alternatives. When wages stagnate, bills skyrocket, NHS waiting lists grow longer, and public services fall apart, voters will latch onto anyone who seems to be shouting loudest about their despair, even if the solutions they offer are shallow or downright harmful. They want the heat of their anger reflected back at them, finally validated by those with power.

Instead of chasing Reform on immigration, Labour must now offer a transformative economic vision that tackles the root causes of discontent: inequality, insecurity, and the collapse of public services. This means being honest about who’s benefited from the past decade, and who’s paid the price. Why have the rich gotten richer while the poorest have been left to struggle? Who profited from the pandemic, while ordinary people watched loved ones die in crowded hospitals and saw their local services fall apart? Why are CEOs pocketing record wages while the rest of us face stagnant wages and insecure work?

This is what the left is for: economic solutions to address inequalities. Beneath Labour’s internal squabbles, there is a path forward, and one that could unite its broad coalition around a radical but credible economic agenda. The Blue Labour faction may have views on social issues that are out of step with Labour’s core supporters, but it still demands economic progressivism and investment in communities. Many backbenchers are privately longing for looser fiscal rules to help weather rising geopolitical challenges. The public, too, wants to see more investment in public services and a fairer tax system that asks those with the broadest shoulders to contribute more.

Start with a wealth tax, which is still popular and long overdue. Reform the broken council tax system that disproportionately hits the poor. And those who sit on large portfolios of unearned wealth should not be paying less tax than those working hard to make ends meet, so shift the tax burden from earnings to wealth by equalising capital gains tax with income tax. Invest in public services and genuinely affordable housing. Put money back into people’s pockets by expanding workers’ rights, and making it easier to secure well-paid, stable work.

To borrow a line from Reform: this is about common sense. People need tangible improvements to their material conditions, not empty promises. The electorate has been misled into thinking tougher borders and more culture war rhetoric are the answers. But beneath it all, it’s the everyday challenges of affordable housing, decent healthcare, well-paid jobs, and clean, safe communities. These are Labour’s core strengths.

The tragedy for Labour is that it has the moral authority – and the space – to make this case. The Tories are tired, discredited, and scandal-ridden. Reform has no real answers or infrastructure to build on. Yet Labour risks squandering its advantage by offering technocratic tweaks and moving further right when what’s needed is political courage.

This round of local elections should not push Labour to the right. The country is crying out for change. Labour must show it knows what that means, or risk watching even more voters walk away.

At The Lead, we’ll keep holding Labour to account and pushing for the bold, transformative change this country urgently needs — to build a fairer, more equal society and to confront the growing threat of the far right. Zoe has written extensively on this, calling on millionaires to pay their share of tax and for the government to reconsider its austerity agenda.

If you enjoy receiving The Lead then consider becoming a paid subscriber to access additional, exclusive, content and support our mission to bring your insights and perspectives beyond the mainstream headlines on people, policy and place.