We have ways of this that can at the same time have ambitions to tackle stormwater (and lower peak) discharges from water treatment sites into our rivers and water courses.
If we mad3 recycled plastic pipe runs just above water treatment sites, and where unviable to do that, used water butts liberally to catch our domestic run-off, we could take charge if our increasingly deluged winter months.
With our excess overnight renewable energy, some of which will also eventually be chemically stored in batteries and converted to hydrogen, but what arrives above those ‘sinks’ could move water from before our sewage plants to nearby woodland and forest enclosure setting by electric pumping, oft during the storms themselves.
These could head into upper canopy tree line bunded storage tanks, however ‘grey’ this water might be, and used for fire suppression there and in the agricultural and scrub/nomansland in between. Deployed either with wax valve release or by emergency services or gallant farmers.
What we learn from the sites that have ideal land relief to make this effective can then signpost what we do for the more disparate and remote locations. For some, the use of pumped sea water or brackish water might be possible using artesian style wind pumps.
We just need to realise that we relied on the rhythm of nature far too much until now. Not that I particularly want to let water companies off the hook by solutionising this problem they have failed to tackle for them.
Recap
1. Recycled plastic is an under utilised commodity, especially with darker yet UV tolerant types
2. Stormwater makes poo get into natures waterways
3. Fire and emergency drought conditions could do with stores that filter in various ways depending how we implement same
If we can prepare to find water on the moon so as to live there with life giving oxygen and hydration/waste-furnaces, we can solve this, no?
Who pays, or do we just reform taxes so that we pay something based on consumption for our changing demographic, and hit the employed commensurately less, so the yield is a snippet higher overall?
End of sermon according to the gospel of non-extremism.
Wow. That was a word-fest. Phew!
We have ways of this that can at the same time have ambitions to tackle stormwater (and lower peak) discharges from water treatment sites into our rivers and water courses.
If we mad3 recycled plastic pipe runs just above water treatment sites, and where unviable to do that, used water butts liberally to catch our domestic run-off, we could take charge if our increasingly deluged winter months.
With our excess overnight renewable energy, some of which will also eventually be chemically stored in batteries and converted to hydrogen, but what arrives above those ‘sinks’ could move water from before our sewage plants to nearby woodland and forest enclosure setting by electric pumping, oft during the storms themselves.
These could head into upper canopy tree line bunded storage tanks, however ‘grey’ this water might be, and used for fire suppression there and in the agricultural and scrub/nomansland in between. Deployed either with wax valve release or by emergency services or gallant farmers.
What we learn from the sites that have ideal land relief to make this effective can then signpost what we do for the more disparate and remote locations. For some, the use of pumped sea water or brackish water might be possible using artesian style wind pumps.
We just need to realise that we relied on the rhythm of nature far too much until now. Not that I particularly want to let water companies off the hook by solutionising this problem they have failed to tackle for them.
Recap
1. Recycled plastic is an under utilised commodity, especially with darker yet UV tolerant types
2. Stormwater makes poo get into natures waterways
3. Fire and emergency drought conditions could do with stores that filter in various ways depending how we implement same
If we can prepare to find water on the moon so as to live there with life giving oxygen and hydration/waste-furnaces, we can solve this, no?
Who pays, or do we just reform taxes so that we pay something based on consumption for our changing demographic, and hit the employed commensurately less, so the yield is a snippet higher overall?
End of sermon according to the gospel of non-extremism.