I think your article and the comment are somewhat previous and wrong. The results show that the Greens Party are still a force to be reckoned with. Polanski secured 32.8% of the vote, as opposed to 10.8% in the general election, and Andrew Feinstein, an indecent, secured 18.9%. This is when we are experiencing the Burnham honeymoon. Let’s see what happens after the budget.
The result shows nothing except Burnham is preferable to Starmer.
What you didn't mention was the Labour candidates record as leader of Camden council and her closeness to the politics of Starmer.
So does Burnham want another regressive Labour person in the party?
I don't think he would have been that disappointed if she lost.
Polanski on the other hand has some serious issues to deal with in the Green Party ie the vote for a one state solution. Already the deputy leader of Welsh Greens has resigned.
He needs to kick out the proposers of the motion and purge the party of these idiots.
now we know where Wali is.
I think your article and the comment are somewhat previous and wrong. The results show that the Greens Party are still a force to be reckoned with. Polanski secured 32.8% of the vote, as opposed to 10.8% in the general election, and Andrew Feinstein, an indecent, secured 18.9%. This is when we are experiencing the Burnham honeymoon. Let’s see what happens after the budget.
The result shows nothing except Burnham is preferable to Starmer.
What you didn't mention was the Labour candidates record as leader of Camden council and her closeness to the politics of Starmer.
So does Burnham want another regressive Labour person in the party?
I don't think he would have been that disappointed if she lost.
Polanski on the other hand has some serious issues to deal with in the Green Party ie the vote for a one state solution. Already the deputy leader of Welsh Greens has resigned.
He needs to kick out the proposers of the motion and purge the party of these idiots.